Map of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, United States with township and municipal boundaries (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
In a municipality already reeling from a controversy involving its police department, Monroeville‘s municipal manager was placed on administrative leave with pay Tuesday evening and could be completely removed from her position Jan. 6.
At a special council meeting, a four-member quorum voted to suspend longtime employee Lynette McKinney. Joe Sedlak was appointed acting manager.
Of those present, councilmen Steve Duncan, Nick Gresock and Jim Johns voted for her suspension, with member Bernhard Erb abstaining. Mr. Johns said he made the motion to slow Ms. McKinney’s spending.
Solicitor Bruce Dice said the process to legally remove the manager is intricate, though her duties ceased Tuesday night.
Editor’s note: And the Borough Manager of Pottstown (population 22,377) rakes in $120,000.00 a year. It would seem a raise is in order! Make sure you read the rest of the article as they list mayor’s salaries for a number of cities in Pennsylvania. NONE are any where near what Pottstown pays its Borough Manager. Somebody’s getting WAY overpaid to run a small town.
Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty has proposed to city council that the next mayor who takes office in 2014 should earn a salary of $80,000, which would be $30,000 more than the $50,000 mayoral salary that has been in place over the past 22 years, he said.
Two council members said they agree that the pay of Scranton’s mayor should be increased because it is very low when compared to comparable midsize cities in the state, but they do not support a 60 percent pay hike of $30,000.
Council is expected today to consider introducing an ordinance to raise the mayor’s pay starting in 2014, Mr. Doherty said.
A new salary of $80,000 being proposed by Mr. Doherty, who earns $50,000 a year, would not be applicable to him, as he is not seeking re-election this year and his term ends in December.
COATESVILLE, PA — More than five weeks after he was fired, former City Manager Gary Rawlings discussed recently why he was let go, the situation with the city’s police department and other issues.
City Council never provided the public with a specific reason as to why they terminated Rawlings on June 11. Rawlings said he, too, was never provided with a reason from council for his eventual dismissal.
“I was never given a reason and can only assume,” said Rawlings, who served as manager for 13 months. “I guess it was that they were unhappy with my style. But I tried to draw a line between my responsibilities and theirs based on the city charter. When it came to personnel matters, I told them they had to stay out of it or else they could get in trouble.
”Rawlings said council was “too involved” in the day-to-day management in the city. He said the council never set goals for him even though it was part of his contract. He said council should “set goals and then step back” when hiring a city manager. He said the next manager will also need more time to develop.
“Thirteen months is not enough time to judge someone’s management style,” Rawlings said.